feat(scoring): Opportunity Score v5 → v6 — calibrate for saturated markets
- Lower density ceiling 8→5/100k (Spain at 6-16/100k now hits zero-gap) - Increase supply deficit weight 35→40 pts (primary differentiator) - Reduce addressable market 25→20 pts (less weight on population alone) - Invert market validation → market headroom (high country maturity = less opportunity) Target: Spain avg opportunity drops from ~78 to ~50-60 range. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -19,22 +19,22 @@
|
||||
-- 10 pts economic context — income PPS normalised to 25,000 ceiling
|
||||
-- 10 pts data quality — completeness discount
|
||||
--
|
||||
-- Padelnomics Opportunity Score (Marktpotenzial-Score v5, 0–100):
|
||||
-- Padelnomics Opportunity Score (Marktpotenzial-Score v6, 0–100):
|
||||
-- "Where should I build a padel court?"
|
||||
-- Computed for ALL locations — zero-court locations score highest on supply deficit.
|
||||
-- H3 catchment methodology: addressable market and supply deficit use a regional
|
||||
-- H3 catchment (res-5 cell + 6 neighbours, ~24km radius).
|
||||
--
|
||||
-- v5 changes: merge supply gap + catchment gap → single supply deficit (35 pts),
|
||||
-- add sports culture proxy (10 pts, tennis density), add construction affordability (5 pts),
|
||||
-- reduce economic power from 20 → 15 pts.
|
||||
-- v6 changes: lower density ceiling 8→5/100k (saturated markets hit zero-gap sooner),
|
||||
-- increase supply deficit weight 35→40 pts, reduce addressable market 25→20 pts,
|
||||
-- invert market validation (high country maturity = LESS opportunity).
|
||||
--
|
||||
-- 25 pts addressable market — log-scaled catchment population, ceiling 500K
|
||||
-- 20 pts addressable market — log-scaled catchment population, ceiling 500K
|
||||
-- 15 pts economic power — income PPS, normalised to 35,000
|
||||
-- 35 pts supply deficit — max(density gap, distance gap); eliminates double-count
|
||||
-- 40 pts supply deficit — max(density gap, distance gap); eliminates double-count
|
||||
-- 10 pts sports culture — tennis court density as racquet-sport adoption proxy
|
||||
-- 5 pts construction affordability — income relative to construction costs (PLI)
|
||||
-- 10 pts market validation — country-level avg market maturity (from market_scored CTE)
|
||||
-- 10 pts market headroom — inverse country-level avg market maturity
|
||||
--
|
||||
-- Consumers query directly with WHERE filters:
|
||||
-- cities API: WHERE country_slug = ? AND city_slug IS NOT NULL
|
||||
@@ -198,9 +198,9 @@ market_scored AS (
|
||||
END AS market_score
|
||||
FROM with_pricing
|
||||
),
|
||||
-- Step 2: country-level avg market maturity — used as market validation signal (10 pts).
|
||||
-- Step 2: country-level avg market maturity — used as market headroom signal (10 pts).
|
||||
-- Filter to market_score > 0 (cities with padel courts only) so zero-court locations
|
||||
-- don't dilute the country signal. ES proven demand → ~60, SE struggling → ~35.
|
||||
-- don't dilute the country signal. Higher avg = more saturated = less headroom.
|
||||
country_market AS (
|
||||
SELECT
|
||||
country_code,
|
||||
@@ -212,21 +212,21 @@ country_market AS (
|
||||
-- Step 3: add opportunity_score using country market validation signal.
|
||||
scored AS (
|
||||
SELECT ms.*,
|
||||
-- ── Opportunity Score (Marktpotenzial-Score v5, H3 catchment) ──────────
|
||||
-- ── Opportunity Score (Marktpotenzial-Score v6, H3 catchment) ──────────
|
||||
ROUND(
|
||||
-- Addressable market (25 pts): log-scaled catchment population, ceiling 500K
|
||||
25.0 * LEAST(1.0, LN(GREATEST(catchment_population, 1)) / LN(500000))
|
||||
-- Addressable market (20 pts): log-scaled catchment population, ceiling 500K
|
||||
20.0 * LEAST(1.0, LN(GREATEST(catchment_population, 1)) / LN(500000))
|
||||
-- Economic power (15 pts): income PPS normalised to 35,000
|
||||
+ 15.0 * LEAST(1.0, COALESCE(median_income_pps, 15000) / 35000.0)
|
||||
-- Supply deficit (35 pts): max of density gap and distance gap.
|
||||
-- Merges old supply gap (30) + catchment gap (15) which were ~80% correlated.
|
||||
+ 35.0 * GREATEST(
|
||||
-- density-based gap (H3 catchment): 0 courts = 1.0, 8/100k = 0.0
|
||||
-- Supply deficit (40 pts): max of density gap and distance gap.
|
||||
-- Ceiling 5/100k (down from 8): Spain at 6-16/100k now hits zero-gap.
|
||||
+ 40.0 * GREATEST(
|
||||
-- density-based gap (H3 catchment): 0 courts = 1.0, 5/100k = 0.0
|
||||
GREATEST(0.0, 1.0 - COALESCE(
|
||||
CASE WHEN catchment_population > 0
|
||||
THEN GREATEST(catchment_padel_courts, COALESCE(city_padel_venue_count, 0))::DOUBLE / catchment_population * 100000
|
||||
ELSE 0.0
|
||||
END, 0.0) / 8.0),
|
||||
END, 0.0) / 5.0),
|
||||
-- distance-based gap: 30km+ = 1.0, 0km = 0.0; NULL = 0.5
|
||||
COALESCE(LEAST(1.0, nearest_padel_court_km / 30.0), 0.5)
|
||||
)
|
||||
@@ -239,10 +239,11 @@ scored AS (
|
||||
COALESCE(median_income_pps, 15000) / 35000.0
|
||||
/ GREATEST(0.5, COALESCE(pli_construction, 100.0) / 100.0)
|
||||
)
|
||||
-- Market validation (10 pts): country-level avg market maturity.
|
||||
-- ES (~70/100): proven demand → ~7 pts. SE (~35/100): emerging → ~3.5 pts.
|
||||
-- NULL (no courts in country yet): 0.5 neutral → 5 pts (untested, not penalised).
|
||||
+ 10.0 * COALESCE(cm.country_avg_market_score / 100.0, 0.5)
|
||||
-- Market headroom (10 pts): INVERSE country-level avg market maturity.
|
||||
-- High avg market score = saturated market = LESS opportunity for new entrants.
|
||||
-- ES (~46/100): proven demand, less headroom → ~5.4 pts.
|
||||
-- SE (~40/100): emerging → ~6 pts. NULL: 0.5 neutral → 5 pts.
|
||||
+ 10.0 * (1.0 - COALESCE(cm.country_avg_market_score / 100.0, 0.5))
|
||||
, 1) AS opportunity_score
|
||||
FROM market_scored ms
|
||||
LEFT JOIN country_market cm ON ms.country_code = cm.country_code
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user