editorial: Feb 2026 content batch review + market maturity rewrite
5-pass editorial pipeline across 11 cornerstone articles (6 DE + 5 EN) and 3 bilingual pSEO templates. All pieces scored ≥4.4 and cleared the publish threshold. Critical/High fixes applied: - Ceiling height inconsistency: 7m → 8m in build guide tables (EN + DE) - HTML <span> tags removed from meta_description_pattern in all 3 templates - German gendering violations fixed in padel-halle-bauen-de (4 instances) - Grammatical gender fix: "Das häufigste Vorabend-Fehler" → "Der häufigste Fehler" - Noun capitalisation: "sport" → "Sport" in padel-standort-analyse-de Medium fixes applied: - Varied repeated "well-run padel halls" phrase in EN investment risks article - Orphaned F&B note elevated to bold callout - Colloquial idiom replaced in EN cost guide - "analyze" → "analyse" (British English) in EN location guide P4-A resolved: replaced static German city-tier lists in both location guide articles with a universal "market maturity stages" framework section (established / growth / emerging markets). Articles are now country-agnostic and link to pSEO country overview pages for live market data. 7 open improvement items remain (P1-A/B, P2-A/B/C, P3-A, P4-B/C) — none are publish blockers. See docs/editorial-review-2026-02.md. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ For a **six-court indoor facility** with solid but not extravagant fit-out, the
|
||||
|
||||
**Construction/conversion (€400k–€800k)** is where projects go over budget most often. Before signing a lease, commission a structural assessment from a contractor experienced in sports hall conversions. A building that looks right on paper can carry hidden costs — drainage, load-bearing upgrades, fire egress — that flip a €500k construction budget to €750k.
|
||||
|
||||
**The courts themselves (€30k–€50k each installed)** vary primarily by glass specification. Full-panorama courts with all-glass back walls cost more than standard hybrid construction. On a six-court project, the difference between the low and high end is roughly €120k — real money, but roughly 8–10% of total project cost. Don't let court spec be the tail wagging the dog.
|
||||
**The courts themselves (€30k–€50k each installed)** vary primarily by glass specification. Full-panorama courts with all-glass back walls cost more than standard hybrid construction. On a six-court project, the difference between the low and high end is roughly €120k — real money, but roughly 8–10% of total project cost. Don't let court specification decisions distort the overall project budget.
|
||||
|
||||
**HVAC (€50k–€120k)** is consistently underestimated. A closed hall with six active courts and 60+ simultaneous players generates significant heat load and humidity. Under-speccing this system creates player complaints, structural moisture damage, and expensive remediation. Budget toward the upper end and treat it as a fixed cost of operating indoors — a well-designed system also reduces energy consumption over the full operating life.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user