From f9faa026830988bd060b5f2440fb5d1f02e76184 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Deeman Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2026 21:48:16 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] editorial: review + improve padel-hall-location-guide-en (C5) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit - "Anyone evaluating" → "Any investor evaluating" in scoring matrix intro (audience precision; article otherwise in excellent shape — highest-quality article in the set, minimal intervention required) Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 --- data/content/articles/padel-hall-location-guide-en.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/data/content/articles/padel-hall-location-guide-en.md b/data/content/articles/padel-hall-location-guide-en.md index b278cd6..693920c 100644 --- a/data/content/articles/padel-hall-location-guide-en.md +++ b/data/content/articles/padel-hall-location-guide-en.md @@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ Key checks before committing to a site: ## The Site Scoring Framework: From 8 Criteria to a Decision -Anyone evaluating multiple sites in parallel needs a comparison tool. A weighted scoring matrix works well: each criterion is rated 1–5 and multiplied by a weighting factor. +Any investor evaluating multiple sites in parallel needs a comparison tool. A weighted scoring matrix works well: each criterion is rated 1–5 and multiplied by a weighting factor. A suggested weighting: