Compare commits

..

4 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Deeman
c3847bb617 merge: Market Score v4 + Opportunity Score v5
All checks were successful
CI / test (push) Successful in 55s
CI / tag (push) Successful in 2s
2026-03-08 15:32:26 +01:00
Deeman
fcef47cb22 chore: update CHANGELOG + admin dependency graph for score v4/v5
- CHANGELOG.md: document Market Score v4 and Opportunity Score v5 changes
- pipeline_routes.py: add dim_countries to location_profiles dependency list

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-03-08 15:32:06 +01:00
Deeman
118c2c0fc7 feat(scoring): Opportunity Score v4 → v5 — fix correlated components
- Merge supply gap (30pts) + catchment gap (15pts) → supply deficit (35pts, GREATEST)
  Eliminates ~80% correlated double-count on a single signal.
- Add sports culture signal (10pts): tennis court density as racquet-sport adoption proxy.
  Ceiling 50 courts/25km. Harmless when tennis data is zero (contributes 0).
- Add construction affordability (5pts): income relative to PLI construction costs.
  Joins dim_countries.pli_construction. High income + low build cost = high score.
- Reduce economic power from 20 → 15pts to make room.

New weights: addressable market 25, economic power 15, supply deficit 35,
sports culture 10, construction affordability 5, market validation 10.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-03-08 15:30:04 +01:00
Deeman
cd6d950233 feat(scoring): Market Score v3 → v4 — fix Spain underscoring
- Lower count gate threshold: 5 → 3 venues (3 establishes a market pattern)
- Lower density ceiling: LN(21) → LN(11) (10/100k is reachable for mature markets)
- Better demand fallback: 0.4 → 0.65 multiplier + 0.3 floor (venues = demand evidence)
- Fix economic context: income/200 → income/25000 (actual discrimination vs free 10 pts)

Expected: Spain avg market score rises from ~54 to ~65-75.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-03-08 15:22:48 +01:00
3 changed files with 64 additions and 36 deletions

View File

@@ -7,6 +7,9 @@ The format is based on [Keep a Changelog](https://keepachangelog.com/en/1.1.0/).
## [Unreleased]
### Changed
- **Market Score v3 → v4** — fixes Spain averaging 54 (should be 65-80). Four calibration changes: count gate threshold lowered from 5 → 3 venues (3 establishes a market pattern), density ceiling lowered from LN(21) → LN(11) (10/100k is reachable for mature markets), demand evidence fallback raised from 0.4 → 0.65 multiplier with 0.3 floor (existence of venues IS evidence of demand), economic context ceiling changed from income/200 → income/25000 (actual discrimination instead of free 10 pts for everyone).
- **Opportunity Score v4 → v5** — fixes structural flaws: supply gap (30pts) + catchment gap (15pts) merged into single supply deficit (35pts, GREATEST of density gap and distance gap) eliminating ~80% correlated double-count. New sports culture signal (10pts) using tennis court density as racquet-sport adoption proxy. New construction affordability signal (5pts) using income relative to PLI construction costs from `dim_countries`. Economic power reduced from 20 → 15pts. New dependency on `foundation.dim_countries` for `pli_construction`.
- **Unified `location_profiles` serving model** — merged `city_market_profile` and `location_opportunity_profile` into a single `serving.location_profiles` table at `(country_code, geoname_id)` grain. Both Marktreife-Score (Market Score) and Marktpotenzial-Score (Opportunity Score) are now computed per location. City data enriched via LEFT JOIN `dim_cities` on `geoname_id`. Downstream models (`planner_defaults`, `pseo_city_costs_de`, `pseo_city_pricing`) updated to query `location_profiles` directly. `city_padel_venue_count` (exact from dim_cities) distinguished from `padel_venue_count` (spatial 5km from dim_locations).
- **Both scores on all map tooltips** — country map shows avg Market Score + avg Opportunity Score; city map shows Market Score + Opportunity Score per city; opportunity map shows Opportunity Score + Market Score per location. All score labels use the trademarked "Padelnomics Market Score" / "Padelnomics Opportunity Score" names.
- **API endpoints** — `/api/markets/countries.json` adds `avg_opportunity_score`; `/api/markets/<country>/cities.json` adds `opportunity_score`; `/api/opportunity/<country>.json` adds `market_score`.

View File

@@ -5,30 +5,36 @@
--
-- Two scores per location:
--
-- Padelnomics Market Score (Marktreife-Score v3, 0100):
-- Padelnomics Market Score (Marktreife-Score v4, 0100):
-- "How mature/established is this padel market?"
-- Only meaningful for locations matched to a dim_cities row (city_slug IS NOT NULL)
-- with padel venues. 0 for all other locations.
--
-- 40 pts supply development — log-scaled density (LN ceiling 20/100k) × count gate
-- 25 pts demand evidence — occupancy when available; 40% density proxy otherwise
-- v4 changes: lower count gate (5→3), lower density ceiling (LN(21)→LN(11)),
-- better demand fallback (0.4→0.65 with 0.3 floor), economic context discrimination (200→25K).
--
-- 40 pts supply development — log-scaled density (LN ceiling 10/100k) × count gate (3)
-- 25 pts demand evidence — occupancy when available; 65% density proxy + 0.3 floor otherwise
-- 15 pts addressable market — log-scaled population, ceiling 1M
-- 10 pts economic context — income PPS normalised to 200 ceiling
-- 10 pts economic context — income PPS normalised to 25,000 ceiling
-- 10 pts data quality — completeness discount
--
-- Padelnomics Opportunity Score (Marktpotenzial-Score v4, 0100):
-- Padelnomics Opportunity Score (Marktpotenzial-Score v5, 0100):
-- "Where should I build a padel court?"
-- Computed for ALL locations — zero-court locations score highest on supply gap.
-- H3 catchment methodology: addressable market and supply gap use a regional
-- Computed for ALL locations — zero-court locations score highest on supply deficit.
-- H3 catchment methodology: addressable market and supply deficit use a regional
-- H3 catchment (res-5 cell + 6 neighbours, ~24km radius).
--
-- 25 pts addressable market — log-scaled catchment population, ceiling 500K
-- 20 pts economic power — income PPS, normalised to 35,000
-- 30 pts supply gap — inverted catchment venue density; 0 courts = full marks
-- 15 pts catchment gap — distance to nearest padel court
-- 10 pts market validation — country-level avg market maturity (from market_scored CTE).
-- Replaces sports culture proxy (v3: tennis data was all zeros).
-- ES (~60/100) → ~6 pts, SE (~35/100) → ~3.5 pts, unknown → 5 pts.
-- v5 changes: merge supply gap + catchment gap → single supply deficit (35 pts),
-- add sports culture proxy (10 pts, tennis density), add construction affordability (5 pts),
-- reduce economic power from 20 → 15 pts.
--
-- 25 pts addressable market — log-scaled catchment population, ceiling 500K
-- 15 pts economic power — income PPS, normalised to 35,000
-- 35 pts supply deficit — max(density gap, distance gap); eliminates double-count
-- 10 pts sports culture — tennis court density as racquet-sport adoption proxy
-- 5 pts construction affordability — income relative to construction costs (PLI)
-- 10 pts market validation — country-level avg market maturity (from market_scored CTE)
--
-- Consumers query directly with WHERE filters:
-- cities API: WHERE country_slug = ? AND city_slug IS NOT NULL
@@ -107,7 +113,7 @@ city_match AS (
ORDER BY c.padel_venue_count DESC
) = 1
),
-- Pricing / occupancy from Playtomic (via city_slug) + H3 catchment
-- Pricing / occupancy from Playtomic (via city_slug) + H3 catchment + country PLI
with_pricing AS (
SELECT
b.*,
@@ -120,6 +126,7 @@ with_pricing AS (
vpb.median_occupancy_rate,
vpb.median_daily_revenue_per_venue,
vpb.price_currency,
dc.pli_construction,
COALESCE(ct.catchment_population, b.population)::BIGINT AS catchment_population,
COALESCE(ct.catchment_padel_courts, b.padel_venue_count)::INTEGER AS catchment_padel_courts
FROM base b
@@ -131,6 +138,8 @@ with_pricing AS (
AND cm.city_slug = vpb.city_slug
LEFT JOIN catchment ct
ON b.geoname_id = ct.geoname_id
LEFT JOIN foundation.dim_countries dc
ON b.country_code = dc.country_code
),
-- Step 1: market score only — needed first so we can aggregate country averages.
market_scored AS (
@@ -146,34 +155,38 @@ market_scored AS (
WHEN population > 0 OR COALESCE(city_padel_venue_count, 0) > 0 THEN 0.5
ELSE 0.0
END AS data_confidence,
-- ── Market Score (Marktreife-Score v3) ──────────────────────────────────
-- ── Market Score (Marktreife-Score v4) ──────────────────────────────────
-- 0 when no city match or no venues (city_padel_venue_count NULL or 0)
CASE WHEN COALESCE(city_padel_venue_count, 0) > 0 THEN
ROUND(
-- Supply development (40 pts)
-- density ceiling 10/100k (LN(11)), count gate 3 venues
40.0 * LEAST(1.0, LN(
COALESCE(
CASE WHEN population > 0
THEN COALESCE(city_padel_venue_count, 0)::DOUBLE / population * 100000
ELSE 0 END
, 0) + 1) / LN(21))
* LEAST(1.0, COALESCE(city_padel_venue_count, 0) / 5.0)
, 0) + 1) / LN(11))
* LEAST(1.0, COALESCE(city_padel_venue_count, 0) / 3.0)
-- Demand evidence (25 pts)
-- with occupancy: scale to 65% target. Without: 65% of supply proxy + 0.3 floor
-- (existence of venues IS evidence of demand)
+ 25.0 * CASE
WHEN median_occupancy_rate IS NOT NULL
THEN LEAST(1.0, median_occupancy_rate / 0.65)
ELSE 0.4 * LEAST(1.0, LN(
ELSE GREATEST(0.3, 0.65 * LEAST(1.0, LN(
COALESCE(
CASE WHEN population > 0
THEN COALESCE(city_padel_venue_count, 0)::DOUBLE / population * 100000
ELSE 0 END
, 0) + 1) / LN(21))
* LEAST(1.0, COALESCE(city_padel_venue_count, 0) / 5.0)
, 0) + 1) / LN(11))
* LEAST(1.0, COALESCE(city_padel_venue_count, 0) / 3.0))
END
-- Addressable market (15 pts)
+ 15.0 * LEAST(1.0, LN(GREATEST(population, 1)) / LN(1000000))
-- Economic context (10 pts)
+ 10.0 * LEAST(1.0, COALESCE(median_income_pps, 100) / 200.0)
-- ceiling 25,000 PPS discriminates between wealthy and poorer markets
+ 10.0 * LEAST(1.0, COALESCE(median_income_pps, 15000) / 25000.0)
-- Data quality (10 pts)
+ 10.0 * CASE
WHEN population > 0 AND COALESCE(city_padel_venue_count, 0) > 0 THEN 1.0
@@ -199,23 +212,35 @@ country_market AS (
-- Step 3: add opportunity_score using country market validation signal.
scored AS (
SELECT ms.*,
-- ── Opportunity Score (Marktpotenzial-Score v4, H3 catchment) ──────────
-- ── Opportunity Score (Marktpotenzial-Score v5, H3 catchment) ──────────
ROUND(
-- Addressable market (25 pts): log-scaled catchment population, ceiling 500K
25.0 * LEAST(1.0, LN(GREATEST(catchment_population, 1)) / LN(500000))
-- Economic power (20 pts): income PPS normalised to 35,000
+ 20.0 * LEAST(1.0, COALESCE(median_income_pps, 15000) / 35000.0)
-- Supply gap (30 pts): inverted catchment venue density
+ 30.0 * GREATEST(0.0, 1.0 - COALESCE(
CASE WHEN catchment_population > 0
THEN GREATEST(catchment_padel_courts, COALESCE(city_padel_venue_count, 0))::DOUBLE / catchment_population * 100000
ELSE 0.0
END, 0.0) / 8.0)
-- Catchment gap (15 pts): distance to nearest court
+ 15.0 * COALESCE(LEAST(1.0, nearest_padel_court_km / 30.0), 0.5)
-- Economic power (15 pts): income PPS normalised to 35,000
+ 15.0 * LEAST(1.0, COALESCE(median_income_pps, 15000) / 35000.0)
-- Supply deficit (35 pts): max of density gap and distance gap.
-- Merges old supply gap (30) + catchment gap (15) which were ~80% correlated.
+ 35.0 * GREATEST(
-- density-based gap (H3 catchment): 0 courts = 1.0, 8/100k = 0.0
GREATEST(0.0, 1.0 - COALESCE(
CASE WHEN catchment_population > 0
THEN GREATEST(catchment_padel_courts, COALESCE(city_padel_venue_count, 0))::DOUBLE / catchment_population * 100000
ELSE 0.0
END, 0.0) / 8.0),
-- distance-based gap: 30km+ = 1.0, 0km = 0.0; NULL = 0.5
COALESCE(LEAST(1.0, nearest_padel_court_km / 30.0), 0.5)
)
-- Sports culture (10 pts): tennis density as racquet-sport adoption proxy.
-- Ceiling 50 courts within 25km. Harmless when tennis data is zero (contributes 0).
+ 10.0 * LEAST(1.0, COALESCE(tennis_courts_within_25km, 0) / 50.0)
-- Construction affordability (5 pts): income purchasing power relative to build costs.
-- PLI construction is EU27=100 index. High income + low construction cost = high score.
+ 5.0 * LEAST(1.0,
COALESCE(median_income_pps, 15000) / 35000.0
/ GREATEST(0.5, COALESCE(pli_construction, 100.0) / 100.0)
)
-- Market validation (10 pts): country-level avg market maturity.
-- Replaces sports culture (v3 tennis data was all zeros = dead code).
-- ES (~60/100): proven demand → ~6 pts. SE (~35/100): struggling → ~3.5 pts.
-- ES (~70/100): proven demand → ~7 pts. SE (~35/100): emerging → ~3.5 pts.
-- NULL (no courts in country yet): 0.5 neutral → 5 pts (untested, not penalised).
+ 10.0 * COALESCE(cm.country_avg_market_score / 100.0, 0.5)
, 1) AS opportunity_score

View File

@@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ _DAG: dict[str, list[str]] = {
"fct_daily_availability": ["fct_availability_slot", "dim_venue_capacity"],
# Serving
"venue_pricing_benchmarks": ["fct_daily_availability"],
"location_profiles": ["dim_locations", "dim_cities", "venue_pricing_benchmarks"],
"location_profiles": ["dim_locations", "dim_cities", "dim_countries", "venue_pricing_benchmarks"],
"planner_defaults": ["venue_pricing_benchmarks", "location_profiles"],
"pseo_city_costs_de": [
"location_profiles", "planner_defaults",